Songpi, April 22, 2026: Nearly four months after 24-year-old MBA student Anjel Chakma from Tripura was murdered in Dehradun for allegedly resisting racial slurs, his family continues to await justice as the prime accused remains at large.
Victim and Incident Details
Anjel Chakma was attacked on December 9, 2025, in the Selaqui area of Dehradun and later succumbed to his injuries on December 26. The incident reportedly occurred after he and his brother opposed racial slurs directed at them.
Family’s Pain and Appeal
Anjel’s father, Tarun Prasad Chakma, a BSF head constable posted along the Bangladesh border in Tripura, said the family is still traumatised but remains hopeful for justice.
“I was broken to the core but despite the tragedy I did not leave my duty. I am guarding my country’s borders and I hope the country will give me justice,” he said. He has recently been transferred from Manipur to Tripura to support his family.
He added that his wife and younger son Michael, who witnessed the attack, are still struggling emotionally. The younger brother reportedly remains silent and carries a sense of guilt over the incident.
Attack and Investigation
The brothers were allegedly assaulted by six individuals, including two minors, following the confrontation. Anjel sustained severe injuries to his neck and lower back and was admitted to a private hospital in Dehradun, where he later died.
The incident sparked widespread outrage and raised concerns over racial discrimination and safety of Northeast students outside the region.
Accused Still Absconding
The prime accused, identified as Yagya Awasthi, is still absconding. According to family members, he is believed to be a native of Nepal.
Anjel’s uncle, Momen Chakma, expressed concern over the delay in justice, stating that the family has been waiting for action since December.
“It is disappointing and worrying that the main accused is still free. We hope he will be arrested soon,” he said.
Call for Justice
The family continues to cope with grief and trauma while urging authorities to act swiftly. The case remains a stark reminder of the need for accountability and protection against discrimination.
